[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <806def7d-16f3-4d53-abc8-7d18e8c22dcb@daynix.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2025 14:44:39 +0900
From: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@...nix.com>
To: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>, Xuan Zhuo
<xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
Yuri Benditovich <yuri.benditovich@...nix.com>,
Andrew Melnychenko <andrew@...nix.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>, gur.stavi@...wei.com,
devel@...nix.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 8/9] tap: Keep hdr_len in tap_get_user()
On 2025/01/20 20:24, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> Akihiko Odaki wrote:
>> hdr_len is repeatedly used so keep it in a local variable.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@...nix.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/tap.c | 17 +++++++----------
>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/tap.c b/drivers/net/tap.c
>> index 061c2f27dfc83f5e6d0bea4da0e845cc429b1fd8..7ee2e9ee2a89fd539b087496b92d2f6198266f44 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/tap.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/tap.c
>> @@ -645,6 +645,7 @@ static ssize_t tap_get_user(struct tap_queue *q, void *msg_control,
>> int err;
>> struct virtio_net_hdr vnet_hdr = { 0 };
>> int vnet_hdr_len = 0;
>> + int hdr_len = 0;
>> int copylen = 0;
>> int depth;
>> bool zerocopy = false;
>> @@ -672,6 +673,7 @@ static ssize_t tap_get_user(struct tap_queue *q, void *msg_control,
>> err = -EINVAL;
>> if (tap16_to_cpu(q, vnet_hdr.hdr_len) > iov_iter_count(from))
>> goto err;
>> + hdr_len = tap16_to_cpu(q, vnet_hdr.hdr_len);
>> }
>>
>> len = iov_iter_count(from);
>> @@ -683,11 +685,8 @@ static ssize_t tap_get_user(struct tap_queue *q, void *msg_control,
>> if (msg_control && sock_flag(&q->sk, SOCK_ZEROCOPY)) {
>> struct iov_iter i;
>>
>> - copylen = vnet_hdr.hdr_len ?
>> - tap16_to_cpu(q, vnet_hdr.hdr_len) : GOODCOPY_LEN;
>> - if (copylen > good_linear)
>> - copylen = good_linear;
>> - else if (copylen < ETH_HLEN)
>> + copylen = min(hdr_len ? hdr_len : GOODCOPY_LEN, good_linear);
>> + if (copylen < ETH_HLEN)
>> copylen = ETH_HLEN;
>> linear = copylen;
>> i = *from;
>> @@ -698,11 +697,9 @@ static ssize_t tap_get_user(struct tap_queue *q, void *msg_control,
>>
>> if (!zerocopy) {
>> copylen = len;
>> - linear = tap16_to_cpu(q, vnet_hdr.hdr_len);
>> - if (linear > good_linear)
>> - linear = good_linear;
>> - else if (linear < ETH_HLEN)
>> - linear = ETH_HLEN;
>> + linear = min(hdr_len, good_linear);
>> + if (copylen < ETH_HLEN)
>> + copylen = ETH_HLEN;
>
> Similar to previous patch, I don't think this patch is significant
> enough to warrant the code churn.
The following patch will require replacing
tap16_to_cpu(q, vnet_hdr.hdr_len)
with
tap16_to_cpu(q->flags, vnet_hdr.hdr_len)
It will make some lines a bit too long. Calling tap16_to_cpu() at
multiple places is also not good to keep the vnet implementation unified
as the function inspects vnet_hdr.
This patch is independently too trivial, but I think it is a worthwhile
cleanup combined with the following patch.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists