lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8071cdff-05dd-4109-9d61-235d83e3a3f6@quicinc.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2025 11:51:58 +0800
From: Ziqi Chen <quic_ziqichen@...cinc.com>
To: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
CC: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>, <quic_cang@...cinc.com>,
        <bvanassche@....org>, <beanhuo@...ron.com>, <avri.altman@....com>,
        <junwoo80.lee@...sung.com>, <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        <quic_nguyenb@...cinc.com>, <quic_nitirawa@...cinc.com>,
        <quic_rampraka@...cinc.com>, <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
        Alim Akhtar
	<alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
        "James E.J. Bottomley"
	<James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
        Peter Wang
	<peter.wang@...iatek.com>,
        Stanley Jhu <chu.stanley@...il.com>,
        "Matthias
 Brugger" <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
	<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
        Andrew Halaney
	<ahalaney@...hat.com>,
        Maramaina Naresh <quic_mnaresh@...cinc.com>,
        "Eric
 Biggers" <ebiggers@...gle.com>,
        Minwoo Im <minwoo.im@...sung.com>,
        open list
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "moderated list:UNIVERSAL FLASH STORAGE HOST
 CONTROLLER DRIVER..." <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "open
 list:UNIVERSAL FLASH STORAGE HOST CONTROLLER DRIVER..."
	<linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        "moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC
 support:Keyword:mediatek" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] scsi: ufs: core: Pass target_freq to
 clk_scale_notify() vops



On 1/20/2025 11:36 PM, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 20, 2025 at 08:01:03PM +0800, Ziqi Chen wrote:
>> Hi Mani,
>>
>> Thanks for you review~
>>
>> On 1/19/2025 3:11 PM, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jan 16, 2025 at 05:11:42PM +0800, Ziqi Chen wrote:
>>>> From: Can Guo <quic_cang@...cinc.com>
>>>>
>>>> If OPP V2 is used, devfreq clock scaling may scale clock amongst more than
>>>> two freqs,
>>>
>>> 'amongst more than two freqs': I couldn't parse this.
>>>
>>
>> It means that the devfreq framework will tell UFS core driver the devfreq
>> freq, then UFS core driver will find the recommended freq from our freq
>> table based on the devfreq freq. For legacy mode , we can only have 2
>> frequencies in the table. But if the OPP V2 is used, we can have 3 , 4 or
>> more freq tables. You can refer to my PATCH 8/8.
>>
> 
> I got the motive, but the wording is not correct.
> 

OK , let me express it in another way:
"Instead of only two frequencies, If OPP V2 is used, the UFS devfreq 
clock scaling may scale the clock among multiple frequencies."
How about this?

>>>> so just passing up/down to vops clk_scale_notify() is not enough
>>>> to cover the intermediate clock freqs between the min and max freqs. Hence
>>>> pass the target_freq to clk_scale_notify() to allow the vops to perform
>>>> corresponding configurations with regard to the clock freqs.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Add a note that the 'target_freq' is not used in this commit.
>>>
>>
>> Sorry, I don't very understand this comment, I mentioned the "target_freq"
>> in the commit message,  Could you let me know what note you want me do add?
>>
> 
> This patch is introducing 'target_freq' as a parameter, but it is not used. I
> was asking you to mention that it will be used in successive commits.
> 

OK , thank you, I will add this note in next version.

-Ziqi

>>>> Co-developed-by: Ziqi Chen <quic_ziqichen@...cinc.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Ziqi Chen <quic_ziqichen@...cinc.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Can Guo <quic_cang@...cinc.com>
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by tag order is not correct here. This implies that Ziqi originally
>>> worked on it, then Can took over and submitted. But it seems the reverse.
>>
>> Thanks for your reminder. Is below tag order OK ?
>>      Signed-off-by: Can Guo <quic_cang@...cinc.com>
>>      Co-developed-by: Ziqi Chen <quic_ziqichen@...cinc.com>
>>      Signed-off-by: Ziqi Chen <quic_ziqichen@...cinc.com>
>>>
>>> - Mani
>>
>> -Ziqi
>>
>>>
>>>> ---
>>>>    drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd-priv.h  | 7 ++++---
>>>>    drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c       | 4 ++--
>>>>    drivers/ufs/host/ufs-mediatek.c | 1 +
>>>>    drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c     | 5 +++--
>>>>    include/ufs/ufshcd.h            | 2 +-
>>>>    5 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd-priv.h b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd-priv.h
>>>> index 9ffd94ddf8c7..0549b65f71ed 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd-priv.h
>>>> +++ b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd-priv.h
>>>> @@ -117,11 +117,12 @@ static inline u32 ufshcd_vops_get_ufs_hci_version(struct ufs_hba *hba)
>>>>    	return ufshcd_readl(hba, REG_UFS_VERSION);
>>>>    }
>>>> -static inline int ufshcd_vops_clk_scale_notify(struct ufs_hba *hba,
>>>> -			bool up, enum ufs_notify_change_status status)
>>>> +static inline int ufshcd_vops_clk_scale_notify(struct ufs_hba *hba, bool up,
>>>> +					       unsigned long target_freq,
>>>> +					       enum ufs_notify_change_status status)
>>>>    {
>>>>    	if (hba->vops && hba->vops->clk_scale_notify)
>>>> -		return hba->vops->clk_scale_notify(hba, up, status);
>>>> +		return hba->vops->clk_scale_notify(hba, up, target_freq, status);
>>>>    	return 0;
>>>>    }
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
>>>> index acc3607bbd9c..8d295cc827cc 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
>>>> @@ -1157,7 +1157,7 @@ static int ufshcd_scale_clks(struct ufs_hba *hba, unsigned long freq,
>>>>    	int ret = 0;
>>>>    	ktime_t start = ktime_get();
>>>> -	ret = ufshcd_vops_clk_scale_notify(hba, scale_up, PRE_CHANGE);
>>>> +	ret = ufshcd_vops_clk_scale_notify(hba, scale_up, freq, PRE_CHANGE);
>>>>    	if (ret)
>>>>    		goto out;
>>>> @@ -1168,7 +1168,7 @@ static int ufshcd_scale_clks(struct ufs_hba *hba, unsigned long freq,
>>>>    	if (ret)
>>>>    		goto out;
>>>> -	ret = ufshcd_vops_clk_scale_notify(hba, scale_up, POST_CHANGE);
>>>> +	ret = ufshcd_vops_clk_scale_notify(hba, scale_up, freq, POST_CHANGE);
>>>>    	if (ret) {
>>>>    		if (hba->use_pm_opp)
>>>>    			ufshcd_opp_set_rate(hba,
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-mediatek.c b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-mediatek.c
>>>> index 135cd78109e2..977dd0caaef6 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-mediatek.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-mediatek.c
>>>> @@ -1643,6 +1643,7 @@ static void ufs_mtk_clk_scale(struct ufs_hba *hba, bool scale_up)
>>>>    }
>>>>    static int ufs_mtk_clk_scale_notify(struct ufs_hba *hba, bool scale_up,
>>>> +				    unsigned long target_freq,
>>>>    				    enum ufs_notify_change_status status)
>>>>    {
>>>>    	if (!ufshcd_is_clkscaling_supported(hba))
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c
>>>> index 68040b2ab5f8..b6eef975dc46 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c
>>>> @@ -1333,8 +1333,9 @@ static int ufs_qcom_clk_scale_down_post_change(struct ufs_hba *hba)
>>>>    	return ufs_qcom_set_core_clk_ctrl(hba, false);
>>>>    }
>>>> -static int ufs_qcom_clk_scale_notify(struct ufs_hba *hba,
>>>> -		bool scale_up, enum ufs_notify_change_status status)
>>>> +static int ufs_qcom_clk_scale_notify(struct ufs_hba *hba, bool scale_up,
>>>> +				     unsigned long target_freq,
>>>> +				     enum ufs_notify_change_status status)
>>>>    {
>>>>    	struct ufs_qcom_host *host = ufshcd_get_variant(hba);
>>>>    	int err;
>>>> diff --git a/include/ufs/ufshcd.h b/include/ufs/ufshcd.h
>>>> index d7aca9e61684..a4dac897a169 100644
>>>> --- a/include/ufs/ufshcd.h
>>>> +++ b/include/ufs/ufshcd.h
>>>> @@ -344,7 +344,7 @@ struct ufs_hba_variant_ops {
>>>>    	void    (*exit)(struct ufs_hba *);
>>>>    	u32	(*get_ufs_hci_version)(struct ufs_hba *);
>>>>    	int	(*set_dma_mask)(struct ufs_hba *);
>>>> -	int	(*clk_scale_notify)(struct ufs_hba *, bool,
>>>> +	int (*clk_scale_notify)(struct ufs_hba *, bool, unsigned long,
>>>>    				    enum ufs_notify_change_status);
>>>>    	int	(*setup_clocks)(struct ufs_hba *, bool,
>>>>    				enum ufs_notify_change_status);
>>>> -- 
>>>> 2.34.1
>>>>
>>>
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ