lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202501230035.cFbLTHtZ-lkp@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2025 00:53:14 +0800
From: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To: Dan Carpenter <error27@...il.com>,
	Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev, Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] xfrm: fix integer overflow in
 xfrm_replay_state_esn_len()

Hi Dan,

kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:

[auto build test WARNING on net/main]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Dan-Carpenter/xfrm-fix-integer-overflow-in-xfrm_replay_state_esn_len/20250121-191827
base:   net/main
patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/018ecf13-e371-4b39-8946-c7510baf916b%40stanley.mountain
patch subject: [PATCH net] xfrm: fix integer overflow in xfrm_replay_state_esn_len()
config: mips-allyesconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250123/202501230035.cFbLTHtZ-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: mips-linux-gcc (GCC) 14.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250123/202501230035.cFbLTHtZ-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202501230035.cFbLTHtZ-lkp@intel.com/

All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):

   In file included from include/linux/string.h:389,
                    from include/linux/bitmap.h:13,
                    from include/linux/cpumask.h:12,
                    from arch/mips/include/asm/processor.h:15,
                    from arch/mips/include/asm/thread_info.h:16,
                    from include/linux/thread_info.h:60,
                    from include/asm-generic/preempt.h:5,
                    from ./arch/mips/include/generated/asm/preempt.h:1,
                    from include/linux/preempt.h:79,
                    from include/linux/spinlock.h:56,
                    from include/net/xfrm.h:7,
                    from net/xfrm/xfrm_replay.c:10:
   In function 'memcmp',
       inlined from 'xfrm_replay_notify_bmp' at net/xfrm/xfrm_replay.c:336:7:
>> include/linux/fortify-string.h:120:33: warning: '__builtin_memcmp' specified bound 4294967295 exceeds maximum object size 2147483647 [-Wstringop-overread]
     120 | #define __underlying_memcmp     __builtin_memcmp
         |                                 ^
   include/linux/fortify-string.h:727:16: note: in expansion of macro '__underlying_memcmp'
     727 |         return __underlying_memcmp(p, q, size);
         |                ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   net/xfrm/xfrm_replay.c: In function 'xfrm_replay_notify_bmp':
   net/xfrm/xfrm_replay.c:308:53: note: source object allocated here
     308 |         struct xfrm_replay_state_esn *replay_esn = x->replay_esn;
         |                                                    ~^~~~~~~~~~~~
   In function 'memcmp',
       inlined from 'xfrm_replay_notify_esn' at net/xfrm/xfrm_replay.c:402:7:
>> include/linux/fortify-string.h:120:33: warning: '__builtin_memcmp' specified bound 4294967295 exceeds maximum object size 2147483647 [-Wstringop-overread]
     120 | #define __underlying_memcmp     __builtin_memcmp
         |                                 ^
   include/linux/fortify-string.h:727:16: note: in expansion of macro '__underlying_memcmp'
     727 |         return __underlying_memcmp(p, q, size);
         |                ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   net/xfrm/xfrm_replay.c: In function 'xfrm_replay_notify_esn':
   net/xfrm/xfrm_replay.c:360:53: note: source object allocated here
     360 |         struct xfrm_replay_state_esn *replay_esn = x->replay_esn;
         |                                                    ~^~~~~~~~~~~~


vim +/__builtin_memcmp +120 include/linux/fortify-string.h

78a498c3a227f2 Alexander Potapenko 2022-10-24  118  
78a498c3a227f2 Alexander Potapenko 2022-10-24  119  #define __underlying_memchr	__builtin_memchr
78a498c3a227f2 Alexander Potapenko 2022-10-24 @120  #define __underlying_memcmp	__builtin_memcmp
a28a6e860c6cf2 Francis Laniel      2021-02-25  121  #define __underlying_strcat	__builtin_strcat
a28a6e860c6cf2 Francis Laniel      2021-02-25  122  #define __underlying_strcpy	__builtin_strcpy
a28a6e860c6cf2 Francis Laniel      2021-02-25  123  #define __underlying_strlen	__builtin_strlen
a28a6e860c6cf2 Francis Laniel      2021-02-25  124  #define __underlying_strncat	__builtin_strncat
a28a6e860c6cf2 Francis Laniel      2021-02-25  125  #define __underlying_strncpy	__builtin_strncpy
2e577732e8d28b Andrey Konovalov    2024-05-17  126  

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ