[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250122181659.GB34562@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2025 19:16:59 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Waiman Long <llong@...hat.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] locking/semaphore: Use wake_q to wake up processes
outside lock critical section
On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 09:51:04AM -0500, Waiman Long wrote:
> Anyway, do you think this patch is worth taking? There are may be other
> cases like this that are hiding somewhere and showing up from time to time.
No objection to the patch, we've been moving wakeup out from under the
lock locks for a while now. It just needs a new rationale, since the
changelog is a bit iffy as-is.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists