lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250122181659.GB34562@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2025 19:16:59 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Waiman Long <llong@...hat.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] locking/semaphore: Use wake_q to wake up processes
 outside lock critical section

On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 09:51:04AM -0500, Waiman Long wrote:

> Anyway, do you think this patch is worth taking? There are may be other
> cases like this that are hiding somewhere and showing up from time to time.

No objection to the patch, we've been moving wakeup out from under the
lock locks for a while now. It just needs a new rationale, since the
changelog is a bit iffy as-is.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ