linux-kernel - Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v12 2/5] dt-bindings: arm: fsl: add imx-se-fw binding doc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250122-feed-empathic-4954564d95ba@spud>
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2025 18:26:55 +0000
From: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta@....com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
	Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
	Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
	Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
	Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
	"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	"imx@...ts.linux.dev" <imx@...ts.linux.dev>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v12 2/5] dt-bindings: arm: fsl: add imx-se-fw
 binding doc

On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 11:35:50AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 20/01/2025 16:01, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > On 20/01/2025 14:07, Pankaj Gupta wrote:
> >>> Driver configures multiple misc-device on the MU, for multiple
> >>> user-space applications, to be able to communicate over single MU.
> >>>
> >>> It exists on some i.MX processors. e.g. i.MX8ULP, i.MX93 etc.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta@....com>
> >>> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@...nel.org>
> >>> Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
> >>
> >>> Where Conor's review tag was actually given?
> >> On v6.
> > 
> > I already looked there. No trace for tag. Please point to the message.
> 
> 
> Still no answer from you, except that evading answer, so let's be clear:
> don't create fake tags.
> 
> Clean your patchset from all fake tags and keep only the ones which were
> real.

Ye, I don't see that R-b given either. My guess is that somehow "go for
it :+1: was interpreted as one, but it certainly was not meant to be
one. Converting that to a tag is definitely not okay. Seems it appeared
in v9 after Rob prompted about /his/ missing review from v8. I never use
my k.org email in tags, so that is an immediate red flag. I think I never
re-opened this thread after seeing that Rob had approved it back in v8,
so I never noticed. Only by chance that I opened in now.

Thanks for spotting it :)

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)