linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: omap4-panda-a4: Add missing model and compatible properties

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAOCHtYj3LumO4pViSOyTwjNxvG1E-DX=JA0-m4Usi1qL+jw21g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2025 14:56:19 -0600
From: Robert Nelson <robertcnelson@...il.com>
To: Andreas Kemnade <andreas@...nade.info>
Cc: Tom Rini <trini@...sulko.com>, Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>, Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, 
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, 
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: omap4-panda-a4: Add missing model and
 compatible properties

On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 2:46 PM Andreas Kemnade <andreas@...nade.info> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Am Tue, 21 Jan 2025 18:08:24 -0600
> schrieb Tom Rini <trini@...sulko.com>:
>
> > > If keeping it is just this binding update, then I'd say we keep it, but
> > > if it gets any more paninful to maintain, I'm also not going to argue
> > > very hard to keep it.
> >
> > I'm not in the position to see if any of the Pandaboards work at this
> > point, so I don't know if they're otherwise functional or a huge pile of
> > problems.
>
> I am still testing stuff with pandaboards. But I do not have the a4
> one. So yes they are functional. Compared with other devices still in
> use using the same SoC, here you can play around with everything, know
> the device. so it is a reference for keeping the really interesting
> devices working.
>
> Regarding the a4: I think it is better to keep that one in, just that
> nobody gets confused if he/she digs out his panda board for some
> comparison test and uses a wrong board revision.

Do you want an a4? I could dig one or two out! ;)

Regards,

-- 
Robert Nelson
https://rcn-ee.com/