linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v9 2/5] cpufreq: Introduce an optional cpuinfo_avg

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250122060902.5pgfr5g24jpjrxw3@vireshk-i7>
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2025 11:39:02 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Beata Michalska <beata.michalska@....com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, ionela.voinescu@....com,
	sudeep.holla@....com, will@...nel.org, catalin.marinas@....com,
	rafael@...nel.org, sumitg@...dia.com, yang@...amperecomputing.com,
	vanshikonda@...amperecomputing.com, lihuisong@...wei.com,
	zhanjie9@...ilicon.com, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
	"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Phil Auld <pauld@...hat.com>,
	x86@...nel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 2/5] cpufreq: Introduce an optional cpuinfo_avg_freq
 sysfs entry

On 21-01-25, 16:17, Beata Michalska wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 04:23:55PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > On 21-01-25, 08:44, Beata Michalska wrote:
> > > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> > > index 6f45684483c4..b2a8efa83c98 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> > > @@ -733,12 +733,20 @@ __weak int arch_freq_get_on_cpu(int cpu)
> > >  	return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > >  }
> > >  
> > >  static ssize_t show_scaling_cur_freq(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, char *buf)
> > >  {
> > >  	ssize_t ret;
> > >  	int freq;
> > >  
> > > -	freq = arch_freq_get_on_cpu(policy->cpu);
> > > +	freq = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CPUFREQ_ARCH_CUR_FREQ)
> > > +		? arch_freq_get_on_cpu(policy->cpu)
> > > +		: 0;
> > > +
> > >  	if (freq > 0)
> > >  		ret = sysfs_emit(buf, "%u\n", freq);
> > >  	else if (cpufreq_driver->setpolicy && cpufreq_driver->get)
> > 
> > Maybe this should be a separate commit ? And also I am not very happy
> Initially it was supposed to be one, but then the rest of the series justifies
> the changes so it made sense to send those in one go.
> > with the new kconfig option. I don't want others to use it as we want
> > to get rid of this for X86 too eventually. Making it a kconfig option
> > allows anyone to enable it and then depend on it without us knowing..
> > 
> > Rather just write it as "if (x86)", with a comment on what we plan to
> > do with it in few release cycles.
> Right, those changes are based on discussion in [1].

Ahh I see.. What about making it depend on X86 for now, as we really
don't want new users to use it ?

-- 
viresh