[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a0e38115-87c7-4145-b9d0-fb8f8ea1fcf7@ideasonboard.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2025 10:02:59 +0200
From: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen+renesas@...asonboard.com>
To: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund@...natech.se>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] media: rcar: Minor cleanups and improvements
Hi,
On 21/01/2025 23:24, Niklas Söderlund wrote:
> Hi Tomi,
>
> Thanks for a great cleanup series!
>
> On 2025-01-20 15:10:33 +0200, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
>> I've started looking at multi-stream support, and came up with these
>> while working towards streams.
>>
>> Tomi
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen+renesas@...asonboard.com>
>
> I have tested this in Gen2, Gen3 and Gen4 without noticing any
> regressions. The log is now spammed with the helpful suggestion that the
> CSI-2 TX subdevices shall implement V4L2_CID_LINK_FREQ control. This is
> annoying but out of scope for this series, but would be nice at some
> point.
>
> [ 37.421531] v4l2_get_link_freq: Link frequency estimated using pixel rate: result might be inaccurate
> [ 37.430991] v4l2_get_link_freq: Consider implementing support for V4L2_CID_LINK_FREQ in the transmitter driver
Which drivers need fixing? The staging max96712 is one (there seems to
be a TODO there about it), and adv748x? I'm not going to work on that
right now, but just collecting the details.
> For the whole series,
>
> Reviewed-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund+renesas@...natech.se>
> Tested-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund+renesas@...natech.se>
Thanks!
Tomi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists