[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250122122304.GM7145@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2025 13:23:04 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Indu Bhagat <indu.bhagat@...cle.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
linux-toolchains@...r.kernel.org, Jordan Rome <jordalgo@...a.com>,
Sam James <sam@...too.org>, linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>,
Jens Remus <jremus@...ux.ibm.com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Weinan Liu <wnliu@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 02/39] task_work: Fix TWA_NMI_CURRENT race with
__schedule()
On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 06:30:54PM -0800, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> @@ -109,11 +126,6 @@ int task_work_add(struct task_struct *task, struct callback_head *work,
> case TWA_SIGNAL_NO_IPI:
> __set_notify_signal(task);
> break;
> -#ifdef CONFIG_IRQ_WORK
> - case TWA_NMI_CURRENT:
> - irq_work_queue(this_cpu_ptr(&irq_work_NMI_resume));
> - break;
> -#endif
> default:
> WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
> break;
Shouldn't this go to in the previous patch?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists