[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1724623586.384707.1737558230381.JavaMail.zimbra@couthit.local>
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2025 20:33:50 +0530 (IST)
From: Basharath Hussain Khaja <basharath@...thit.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: basharath <basharath@...thit.com>, danishanwar <danishanwar@...com>,
rogerq <rogerq@...nel.org>, andrew+netdev <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
davem <davem@...emloft.net>, edumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
kuba <kuba@...nel.org>, pabeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, krzk+dt <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
conor+dt <conor+dt@...nel.org>, nm <nm@...com>,
ssantosh <ssantosh@...nel.org>, tony <tony@...mide.com>,
richardcochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
parvathi <parvathi@...thit.com>, schnelle <schnelle@...ux.ibm.com>,
rdunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>, diogo ivo <diogo.ivo@...mens.com>,
m-karicheri2 <m-karicheri2@...com>, horms <horms@...nel.org>,
jacob e keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>,
m-malladi <m-malladi@...com>,
javier carrasco cruz <javier.carrasco.cruz@...il.com>,
afd <afd@...com>, s-anna <s-anna@...com>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-omap <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
pratheesh <pratheesh@...com>, prajith <prajith@...com>,
vigneshr <vigneshr@...com>, praneeth <praneeth@...com>,
srk <srk@...com>, rogerq <rogerq@...com>,
krishna <krishna@...thit.com>, pmohan <pmohan@...thit.com>,
mohan <mohan@...thit.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 01/10] dt-bindings: net: ti: Adds device tree
binding for DUAL-EMAC mode support on PRU-ICSS2 for AM57xx SOCs
> On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 06:56:14PM +0530, Basharath Hussain Khaja wrote:
>>
>> >> + ti,no-half-duplex:
>> >> + type: boolean
>> >> + description:
>> >> + Disable half duplex operation on ICSSM MII port.
>> >
>> > I already asked this in the next patch, but why have this property? Is
>> > it because the hardware is broken? Or is this some sort of policy?
>> > Policy should not be in DT, DT describes the hardware, not the policy
>> > of how you use the hardware.
>> >
>>
>> This series of patches enables support for full-duplex only. Support for
>> half-duplex will be added in subsequent revisions. We will clean it up in
>> the next version.
>
> So you don't need this property. All you need to do is remove the 1/2
> duplex link modes using phy_remove_link_mode() and user space will not
> get the option to enable them, not will auto-neg advertise them.
Sure. We will remove this property and make necessary changes at all places in the next version.
Thanks & Best Regards,
Basharath
Powered by blists - more mailing lists