[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1841709010.384806.1737561461669.JavaMail.zimbra@couthit.local>
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2025 21:27:41 +0530 (IST)
From: Basharath Hussain Khaja <basharath@...thit.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: basharath <basharath@...thit.com>, danishanwar <danishanwar@...com>,
rogerq <rogerq@...nel.org>, andrew+netdev <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
davem <davem@...emloft.net>, edumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
kuba <kuba@...nel.org>, pabeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, krzk+dt <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
conor+dt <conor+dt@...nel.org>, nm <nm@...com>,
ssantosh <ssantosh@...nel.org>, tony <tony@...mide.com>,
richardcochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
parvathi <parvathi@...thit.com>, schnelle <schnelle@...ux.ibm.com>,
rdunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>, diogo ivo <diogo.ivo@...mens.com>,
m-karicheri2 <m-karicheri2@...com>, horms <horms@...nel.org>,
jacob e keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>,
m-malladi <m-malladi@...com>,
javier carrasco cruz <javier.carrasco.cruz@...il.com>,
afd <afd@...com>, s-anna <s-anna@...com>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-omap <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
pratheesh <pratheesh@...com>, prajith <prajith@...com>,
vigneshr <vigneshr@...com>, praneeth <praneeth@...com>,
srk <srk@...com>, rogerq <rogerq@...com>,
krishna <krishna@...thit.com>, pmohan <pmohan@...thit.com>,
mohan <mohan@...thit.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 03/10] net: ti: prueth: Adds PRUETH HW and SW
configuration
>> +/* Below macro is for 1528 Byte Frame support, to Allow even with
>> + * Redundancy tag
>> + */
>> +#define PRUSS_MII_RT_RX_FRMS_MAX_SUPPORT_EMAC (VLAN_ETH_FRAME_LEN + \
>> + ETH_FCS_LEN + 6)
>
> Is 6 for the redundancy tag? Is the redundancy tag defined somewhere?
> Could this 6 be replaced by a #define, which is maybe a sizeof()?
>
Yes. 6 is for redundancy tag. We will create a MACRO and use
MACRO instead of hard coded value.
>> + dev_info(dev, "TI PRU ethernet driver initialized: %s EMAC mode\n",
>> + (!eth0_node || !eth1_node) ? "single" : "dual");
>> +
>
> Is that really true? Is it not in dual mode, but only one interface is
> in use? I also wounder at the value of spamming the log like this.
>
This might be valid if in case user decides to use only one MAC port by
changing dts configuration.
Thanks & Best Regards,
Basharath
Powered by blists - more mailing lists