[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250122111322.26eb3540@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2025 11:13:22 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar
<mingo@...nel.org>, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Indu Bhagat <indu.bhagat@...cle.com>, Mark
Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, Alexander Shishkin
<alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>, Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>, Adrian
Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, Mark
Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, linux-toolchains@...r.kernel.org, Jordan Rome
<jordalgo@...a.com>, Sam James <sam@...too.org>,
linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andrii Nakryiko
<andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>, Jens Remus <jremus@...ux.ibm.com>, Mathieu
Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>, Florian Weimer
<fweimer@...hat.com>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, Masami Hiramatsu
<mhiramat@...nel.org>, Weinan Liu <wnliu@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/39] unwind, perf: sframe user space unwinding
On Tue, 21 Jan 2025 18:30:52 -0800
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org> wrote:
> The interface is similar to {task,irq}_work. The caller owns an
> unwind_work struct:
>
> struct unwind_work {
> struct callback_head work;
> unwind_callback_t func;
> int pending;
> };
>
> For perf, struct unwind_work is embedded in struct perf_event. For
> ftrace maybe it would live in task_struct?
Hmm, this is going to be difficult, as I don't want to add more to a task
struct as it's already too bloated as is. I'll have to think about this a bit.
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists