[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z5EfRcA5BCsPiMcy@hoboy.vegasvil.org>
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2025 08:39:33 -0800
From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
To: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@...ssschuh.net>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@...utronix.de>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
John Stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] posix-clock: Explicitly handle compat ioctls
On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 11:41:24PM +0100, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> Pointer arguments passed to ioctls need to pass through compat_ptr() to
> work correctly on s390; as explained in Documentation/driver-api/ioctl.rst.
PTP_ENABLE_PPS is either on of off, and the code tests whether the
passed argument is zero or not.
So does this compat code actually fix an issue for s390?
Thanks,
Richard
Powered by blists - more mailing lists