[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250123075321.4442-1-zuoqian113@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2025 07:53:20 +0000
From: zuoqian <zuoqian113@...il.com>
To: sudeep.holla@....com,
rafael@...nel.org,
viresh.kumar@...aro.org
Cc: cristian.marussi@....com,
arm-scmi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
zuoqian <zuoqian113@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH] cpufreq: scpi: compare against frequency instead of rate
The CPU rate from clk_get_rate() may not be divisible by 1000
(e.g., 133333333). But the rate calculated from frequency is always
divisible by 1000 (e.g., 133333000).
Comparing the rate causes a warning during CPU scaling:
"cpufreq: __target_index: Failed to change cpu frequency: -5".
When we choose to compare frequency here, the issue does not occur.
Signed-off-by: zuoqian <zuoqian113@...il.com>
---
drivers/cpufreq/scpi-cpufreq.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/scpi-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/scpi-cpufreq.c
index cd89c1b9832c..3bff4bb5ab4a 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/scpi-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/scpi-cpufreq.c
@@ -39,8 +39,9 @@ static unsigned int scpi_cpufreq_get_rate(unsigned int cpu)
static int
scpi_cpufreq_set_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
{
- u64 rate = policy->freq_table[index].frequency * 1000;
+ unsigned long freq = policy->freq_table[index].frequency;
struct scpi_data *priv = policy->driver_data;
+ u64 rate = freq * 1000;
int ret;
ret = clk_set_rate(priv->clk, rate);
@@ -48,7 +49,7 @@ scpi_cpufreq_set_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
if (ret)
return ret;
- if (clk_get_rate(priv->clk) != rate)
+ if (clk_get_rate(priv->clk) / 1000 != freq)
return -EIO;
return 0;
--
2.43.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists