[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20250123083323.2363749-1-jackhuang021@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2025 16:33:24 +0800
From: jack21 <jackhuang021@...il.com>
To: sudeep.holla@....com,
cristian.marussi@....com
Cc: arm-scmi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Huangjie <huangjie1663@...tium.com.cn>
Subject: [PATCH] dirvers: scmi: poll again when transfer reach timeout
From: Huangjie <huangjie1663@...tium.com.cn>
spin_until_cond() not really hold a spin lock, possible timeout may occur
in preemption kernel when preempted after spin_until_cond().
We check status again when reach timeout is reached to prevent incorrect
jugement of timeout.
Signed-off-by: Huangjie <huangjie1663@...tium.com.cn>
---
drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c
index 1b5fb2c4ce86..10b049fe5fd0 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c
@@ -1246,7 +1246,8 @@ static int scmi_wait_for_reply(struct device *dev, const struct scmi_desc *desc,
spin_until_cond(scmi_xfer_done_no_timeout(cinfo,
xfer, stop));
- if (ktime_after(ktime_get(), stop)) {
+ if (ktime_after(ktime_get(), stop) &&
+ !info->desc->ops->poll_done(cinfo, xfer)) {
dev_err(dev,
"timed out in resp(caller: %pS) - polling\n",
(void *)_RET_IP_);
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists