linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] perf/dwc_pcie: fix duplicate pci

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <344c53cd-d856-4c03-9deb-743b65acd8aa@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2025 17:49:50 +0800
From: Shuai Xue <xueshuai@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: Yunhui Cui <cuiyunhui@...edance.com>, renyu.zj@...ux.alibaba.com,
 will@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
 linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf/dwc_pcie: fix duplicate pci_dev devices



在 2025/1/23 15:48, Yunhui Cui 写道:
> During platform_device_register, wrongly using struct device
> pci_dev as platform_data caused a kmemdup copy of pci_dev. Worse
> still, accessing the duplicated device leads to list corruption as its
> mutex content (e.g., list, magic) remains the same as the original.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yunhui Cui <cuiyunhui@...edance.com>
> ---
>   drivers/perf/dwc_pcie_pmu.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++-------
>   1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/perf/dwc_pcie_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/dwc_pcie_pmu.c
> index cccecae9823f..8b208f287a1f 100644
> --- a/drivers/perf/dwc_pcie_pmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/perf/dwc_pcie_pmu.c
> @@ -565,9 +565,7 @@ static int dwc_pcie_register_dev(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>   	u32 sbdf;
>   
>   	sbdf = (pci_domain_nr(pdev->bus) << 16) | PCI_DEVID(pdev->bus->number, pdev->devfn);
> -	plat_dev = platform_device_register_data(NULL, "dwc_pcie_pmu", sbdf,
> -						 pdev, sizeof(*pdev));
> -
> +	plat_dev = platform_device_register_simple("platform_dwc_pcie", sbdf, NULL, 0);
>   	if (IS_ERR(plat_dev))
>   		return PTR_ERR(plat_dev);
>   
> @@ -614,19 +612,32 @@ static struct notifier_block dwc_pcie_pmu_nb = {
>   
>   static int dwc_pcie_pmu_probe(struct platform_device *plat_dev)
>   {
> -	struct pci_dev *pdev = plat_dev->dev.platform_data;
> +	struct pci_dev *pdev = NULL;
>   	struct dwc_pcie_pmu *pcie_pmu;
> +	bool found = false;
>   	char *name;
>   	u32 sbdf;
>   	u16 vsec;
>   	int ret;
>   
> +	for_each_pci_dev(pdev) {
> +		sbdf = (pci_domain_nr(pdev->bus) << 16) | PCI_DEVID(pdev->bus->number, pdev->devfn);
> +		if (sbdf == plat_dev->id) {
> +			found = true;
> +			break;
> +		}
> +	}
> +	if (!found) {
> +		pr_err("The plat_dev->id does not match the sbdf");
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +	}
> +

How about using pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot() to find pci_dev?

>   	vsec = dwc_pcie_des_cap(pdev);
>   	if (!vsec)
>   		return -ENODEV;
>   
>   	sbdf = plat_dev->id;
> -	name = devm_kasprintf(&plat_dev->dev, GFP_KERNEL, "dwc_rootport_%x", sbdf);
> +	name = devm_kasprintf(&plat_dev->dev, GFP_KERNEL, "dwc_rootport_%d_pmu", sbdf);

A new name will break previous user tools.

>   	if (!name)
>   		return -ENOMEM;
>   
> @@ -640,7 +651,7 @@ static int dwc_pcie_pmu_probe(struct platform_device *plat_dev)
>   	pcie_pmu->on_cpu = -1;
>   	pcie_pmu->pmu = (struct pmu){
>   		.name		= name,
> -		.parent		= &pdev->dev,
> +		.parent		= &plat_dev->dev,
>   		.module		= THIS_MODULE,
>   		.attr_groups	= dwc_pcie_attr_groups,
>   		.capabilities	= PERF_PMU_CAP_NO_EXCLUDE,
> @@ -727,7 +738,7 @@ static int dwc_pcie_pmu_offline_cpu(unsigned int cpu, struct hlist_node *cpuhp_n
>   
>   static struct platform_driver dwc_pcie_pmu_driver = {
>   	.probe = dwc_pcie_pmu_probe,
> -	.driver = {.name = "dwc_pcie_pmu",},
> +	.driver = {.name = "platform_dwc_pcie",},
>   };
>   
>   static int __init dwc_pcie_pmu_init(void)

Thanks.

Best Regards,
Shuai