[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250123114306.5c2f767e@kmaincent-XPS-13-7390>
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2025 11:43:06 +0100
From: Kory Maincent <kory.maincent@...tlin.com>
To: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Jakub Kicinski
<kuba@...nel.org>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni
<pabeni@...hat.com>, Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, Christophe Leroy
<christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>, Herve Codina <herve.codina@...tlin.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>, Heiner Kallweit
<hkallweit1@...il.com>, Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>, Marek
Behún <kabel@...nel.org>, Oleksij Rempel
<o.rempel@...gutronix.de>, Nicolò Veronese
<nicveronese@...il.com>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>,
mwojtas@...omium.org, Antoine Tenart <atenart@...nel.org>, Rob Herring
<robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next RFC v2 0/6] net: phy: Introduce a port
representation
On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 11:31:21 +0100
Kory Maincent <kory.maincent@...tlin.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 18:42:45 +0100
> Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com> wrote:
>
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > This is a second RFC for the introduction of a front-facing interfaces
> > for ethernet devices.
> >
> > The firts RFC[1] already got some reviews, focusing on the DT part of
> > that work. To better lay the ground for further discussions, this second
> > round includes a binding :)
> >
> > Oleksij suggested some further possibilities for improving this binding,
> > as we could consider describing connectors in great details for
> > crossover detection, PoE ping mappings, etc. However, as this is
> > preliminary work, the included binding is still quite simple but can
> > certainly be extended.
> >
> > This RFC V2 doesn't bring much compared to V1 :
> > - A binding was introduced
> > - A warning has been fixed in the dp83822 patch
> > - The "lanes" property has been made optional
>
> Small question, I know you want to begin with something simple but would it be
> possible to consider how to support the port representation in NIT and
> switch drivers? Maybe it is out of your scope but it would be nice if you
> consider how NIT and switches can support it in your development.
s/NIT/NIC/
Sorry.
--
Köry Maincent, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists