[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250124152824.292985bf@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2025 15:28:24 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Keita Morisaki <keyz@...gle.com>
Cc: mhiramat@...nel.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
lpieralisi@...nel.org, sudeep.holla@....com, rafael@...nel.org,
daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, aarontian@...gle.com,
yimingtseng@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] cpuidle: psci: Add trace for PSCI domain idle
On Mon, 20 Jan 2025 09:36:16 +0800
Keita Morisaki <keyz@...gle.com> wrote:
> The trace event cpu_idle provides insufficient information for debugging
> PSCI requests due to lacking access to determined PSCI domain idle
> states. The cpu_idle usually only shows -1, 0, or 1 regardless how many
> idle states the power domain has.
>
> Add new trace events namely psci_domain_idle_enter and
> psci_domain_idle_exit to trace enter and exit events with a determined
> idle state.
>
> These new trace events will help developers debug CPUidle issues on ARM
> systems using PSCI by providing more detailed information about the
> requested idle states.
>
> Signed-off-by: Keita Morisaki <keyz@...gle.com>
> ---
> v1->v2: Split the ftrace event into two (psci_domain_idle_(enter|exit))
> and rephrase the commit message accordingly. Rebased onto the latest.
>
> drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci.c | 3 +++
> include/trace/events/power.h | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 40 insertions(+)
From the tracing point of view, there's nothing that sticks out that is incorrect.
Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@...dmis.org>
As for if it should be applied, that's for the maintainers of the subsystem
that it exists in.
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists