lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z5MxUBNheFBpNvZ_@gpd3>
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2025 07:21:04 +0100
From: Andrea Righi <arighi@...dia.com>
To: Changwoo Min <changwoo@...lia.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, David Vernet <void@...ifault.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched_ext: Fix lock imbalance in dispatch_to_local_dsq()

On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 11:21:33AM +0900, Changwoo Min wrote:
> Hello Andrea,
> 
> On 25. 1. 24. 08:42, Andrea Righi wrote:
> >   kernel/sched/ext.c | 2 ++
> >   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/kernel/sched/ext.c b/kernel/sched/ext.c
> > index a24d48cebfb7..7500b1a26757 100644
> > --- a/kernel/sched/ext.c
> > +++ b/kernel/sched/ext.c
> > @@ -2617,6 +2617,8 @@ static void dispatch_to_local_dsq(struct rq *rq, struct scx_dispatch_q *dst_dsq,
> >   		/* if the destination CPU is idle, wake it up */
> >   		if (sched_class_above(p->sched_class, dst_rq->curr->sched_class))
> >   			resched_curr(dst_rq);
> > +	} else {
> > +		dst_rq = src_rq;
> >   	}
> 
> The fix makes sense to me. Since this is a very specific and
> tricky case, it will be better to include detailed comments in
> the else part so anyone can easily understand why the else part
> is necessary.

Good idea, I'll send a v2 including a comment in the else part.

Thanks!
-Andrea

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ