linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] KFENCE: Clarify that sample allocations are not following NUMA or memory policies

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CANpmjNM_2EB-sTBjPDADNh_cAEJS8euY_71pw0WNu2h_eisAYA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2025 09:37:43 +0100
From: Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Cc: cl@...two.org, Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>, 
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, 
	Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>, Huang Shijie <shijie@...amperecomputing.com>, 
	kasan-dev@...glegroups.com, workflows@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KFENCE: Clarify that sample allocations are not following
 NUMA or memory policies

On Fri, 24 Jan 2025 at 09:13, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz> wrote:
>
> On 1/23/25 23:44, Christoph Lameter via B4 Relay wrote:
> > From: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
> >
> > KFENCE manages its own pools and redirects regular memory allocations
> > to those pools in a sporadic way. The usual memory allocator features
> > like NUMA, memory policies and pfmemalloc are not supported.
>
> Can it also violate __GFP_THISNODE constraint? That could be a problem, I
> recall a problem in the past where it could have been not honoured by the
> page allocator, leading to corruption of slab lists.

KFENCE does not sample page allocator allocations. Is kmalloc()
allowed to take __GFP_THISNODE?