linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] landlock: fix grammar and spelling error

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Z5NcT4Z3Fo5RrB9s@google.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2025 10:24:31 +0100
From: "Günther Noack" <gnoack@...gle.com>
To: Tanya Agarwal <tanyaagarwal25699@...il.com>
Cc: zohar@...ux.ibm.com, mic@...ikod.net, paul@...l-moore.com, 
	jmorris@...ei.org, serge@...lyn.com, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, skhan@...uxfoundation.org, 
	anupnewsmail@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] landlock: fix grammar and spelling error

On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 01:12:10AM +0530, Tanya Agarwal wrote:
> From: Tanya Agarwal <tanyaagarwal25699@...il.com>
> 
> Fix grammar and spelling error in landlock module comments that were
> identified using the codespell tool.
> No functional changes - documentation only.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tanya Agarwal <tanyaagarwal25699@...il.com>
> Reviewed-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>
> ---
> Original discussion:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250112072925.1774-1-tanyaagarwal25699@gmail.com
> 
> This patch set is split into individual patches for each LSM
> to facilitate easier review by respective maintainers.
> 
>  security/landlock/ruleset.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/security/landlock/ruleset.c b/security/landlock/ruleset.c
> index a93bdbf52fff..c464d1f84792 100644
> --- a/security/landlock/ruleset.c
> +++ b/security/landlock/ruleset.c
> @@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ create_rule(const struct landlock_id id,
>  		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>  	RB_CLEAR_NODE(&new_rule->node);
>  	if (is_object_pointer(id.type)) {
> -		/* This should be catched by insert_rule(). */
> +		/* This should have been caught by insert_rule(). */
>  		WARN_ON_ONCE(!id.key.object);
>  		landlock_get_object(id.key.object);
>  	}
> -- 
> 2.39.5
> 

Reviewed-by: Günther Noack <gnoack@...gle.com>

Thanks!

—Günther