lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAH5fLggCLSRfiAGnb9ZDRdUsMrBxWDjbVSxVqtdduDi5D1vQtA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2025 10:42:53 +0100
From: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Christian Schrefl <chrisi.schrefl@...il.com>, Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, 
	Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, 
	Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>, Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>, 
	Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>, Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>, 
	Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, 
	rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] rust: miscdevice: adjust the rust_misc_device sample
 to use RegistrationData.

On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 9:06 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 08:29:38AM +0100, Alice Ryhl wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 23, 2025 at 6:57 PM Christian Schrefl
> > <chrisi.schrefl@...il.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Alice
> > >
> > > On 21.01.25 4:40 PM, Alice Ryhl wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Jan 19, 2025 at 11:11 PM Christian Schrefl
> > > > <chrisi.schrefl@...il.com> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> Share the mutex stored in RustMiscDevice between all instances using an Arc
> > > >> and the RegistrationData of MiscDeviceRegistration.
> > > >>
> > > >> This is mostly to Demonstrate the capability to share data in this way.
> > > >>
> > > >> Signed-off-by: Christian Schrefl <chrisi.schrefl@...il.com>
> > > >
> > > > This change causes all open files to share the same value, instead of
> > > > it being per-fd.
> > >
> > > I know, if that is unwanted I'm fine with dropping this patch,
> > > it is mostly here to show how patch 2 can be used.
> >
> > Perhaps instead of changing the per-fd value, we could add a new
> > shared value? E.g., it could have a counter for the number of open
> > files.
>
> Counters don't work, sorry (think about dup() for file handles), please,
> either make it per-file handle, or a "global" thing for the specific
> object, don't attempt to count open/release calls, the vfs does this for
> us already.

I mean, it's just for an example, shrug. It could also be another
ioctl that updates the shared value.

Alice

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ