linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] kci-gitlab: Introducing GitLab-CI Pipeline for Kernel Testing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <D7AAOSNDJV11.AXVF80Z934BK@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2025 14:16:52 +0200
From: "Jarkko Sakkinen" <jarkko@...nel.org>
To: "Laurent Pinchart" <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
 Leonardo Brás <leobras.c@...il.com>
Cc: "Vignesh Raman" <vignesh.raman@...labora.com>,
 <kernelci@...ts.linux.dev>, <linuxtv-ci@...uxtv.org>,
 <dave.pigott@...labora.com>, <mripard@...nel.org>,
 <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
 <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>, <gustavo.padovan@...labora.com>,
 <pawiecz@...labora.com>, <spbnick@...il.com>, <tales.aparecida@...il.com>,
 <workflows@...r.kernel.org>, <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
 <kunit-dev@...glegroups.com>, <nfraprado@...labora.com>,
 <davidgow@...gle.com>, <cocci@...ia.fr>, <Julia.Lawall@...ia.fr>,
 <laura.nao@...labora.com>, <kernel@...labora.com>,
 <torvalds@...uxfoundation.org>, <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
 <daniels@...labora.com>, <helen.koike@...labora.com>,
 <shreeya.patel@...labora.com>, <denys.f@...labora.com>,
 <nicolas.dufresne@...labora.com>, <louis.chauvet@...tlin.com>,
 <hamohammed.sa@...il.com>, <melissa.srw@...il.com>, <simona@...ll.ch>,
 <airlied@...il.com>, <Tim.Bird@...y.com>, <broonie@...nel.org>,
 <groeck@...gle.com>, <rdunlap@...radead.org>, <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
 <michel.daenzer@...lbox.org>, <sakari.ailus@....fi>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] kci-gitlab: Introducing GitLab-CI Pipeline for
 Kernel Testing

On Fri Jan 24, 2025 at 10:12 AM EET, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Gitlab as an open-source software project (the community edition) is one
> thing, but can we please avoid advertising specific proprietary services
> in the kernel documentation ?

I don't think we should have any of this in the mainline kernel.

One angle is that "no regressions rule" applies also to the shenanigans.

Do we really spend energy on this proprietary crap to the eternity?

BR, Jarkko