linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next v3 1/4] net: stmmac: Switch to zero-copy in non-XDP RX path

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250124095305.00002b3e@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2025 09:53:05 +0800
From: Furong Xu <0x1207@...il.com>
To: Brad Griffis <bgriffis@...dia.com>
Cc: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@...el.com>, Joe Damato
 <jdamato@...tly.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, "David S.
 Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub
 Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Maxime
 Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>, xfr@...look.com,
 "linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 1/4] net: stmmac: Switch to zero-copy in
 non-XDP RX path

On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 11:53:21 -0800, Brad Griffis <bgriffis@...dia.com> wrote:

> On 1/23/25 08:35, Furong Xu wrote:
> > What is the MTU of Tegra234 and NFS server? Are they both 1500?  
> 
> I see the same issue.  Yes, both are 1500.
> 
> > Could you please try attached patch to confirm if this regression is
> > fixed?  
> 
> Patch fixes the issue.
> 
> > If the attached patch fixes this regression, and so it seems to be a
> > cache coherence issue specific to Tegra234, since this patch avoid
> > memcpy and the page buffers may be modified by upper network stack of
> > course, then cache lines of page buffers may become dirty. But by
> > reverting this patch, cache lines of page buffers never become dirty,
> > this is the core difference.  
> 
> Thanks for these insights. I don't have specific experience in this 
> driver, but I see we have dma-coherent turned on for this driver in our 
> downstream device tree files (i.e. dtbs that coincide with our 
> out-of-tree implementation of this driver).  I went back to the original 
> code and verified that the issue was there. I did a new test where I 
> added dma-coherent to this ethernet node in the dtb and retested. It worked!
> 
> Just to clarify, the patch that you had us try was not intended as an 
> actual fix, correct? It was only for diagnostic purposes, i.e. to see if 
> there is some kind of cache coherence issue, which seems to be the case? 

It is not an actual fix, it is only for diagnostic purposes.

>   So perhaps the only fix needed is to add dma-coherent to our device tree?

Yes, add dma-coherent to ethernet node is the correct fix.