linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] kci-gitlab: Introducing GitLab-CI Pipeline for Kernel Testing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <298675d0-ba19-4c87-b00d-57a5e31b05b6@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2025 15:00:51 +0200
From: Nikolai Kondrashov <Nikolai.Kondrashov@...hat.com>
To: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>,
 Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
 Leonardo Brás <leobras.c@...il.com>
Cc: Vignesh Raman <vignesh.raman@...labora.com>, kernelci@...ts.linux.dev,
 linuxtv-ci@...uxtv.org, dave.pigott@...labora.com, mripard@...nel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
 linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, gustavo.padovan@...labora.com,
 pawiecz@...labora.com, spbnick@...il.com, tales.aparecida@...il.com,
 workflows@...r.kernel.org, skhan@...uxfoundation.org,
 kunit-dev@...glegroups.com, nfraprado@...labora.com, davidgow@...gle.com,
 cocci@...ia.fr, Julia.Lawall@...ia.fr, laura.nao@...labora.com,
 kernel@...labora.com, torvalds@...uxfoundation.org,
 gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, daniels@...labora.com,
 helen.koike@...labora.com, shreeya.patel@...labora.com,
 denys.f@...labora.com, nicolas.dufresne@...labora.com,
 louis.chauvet@...tlin.com, hamohammed.sa@...il.com, melissa.srw@...il.com,
 simona@...ll.ch, airlied@...il.com, Tim.Bird@...y.com, broonie@...nel.org,
 groeck@...gle.com, rdunlap@...radead.org, geert@...ux-m68k.org,
 michel.daenzer@...lbox.org, sakari.ailus@....fi
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] kci-gitlab: Introducing GitLab-CI Pipeline for
 Kernel Testing

On 1/24/25 2:16 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Fri Jan 24, 2025 at 10:12 AM EET, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>> Gitlab as an open-source software project (the community edition) is one
>> thing, but can we please avoid advertising specific proprietary services
>> in the kernel documentation ?
> 
> I don't think we should have any of this in the mainline kernel.
> 
> One angle is that "no regressions rule" applies also to the shenanigans.
> 
> Do we really spend energy on this proprietary crap to the eternity?

This is not getting included into the kernel itself, the contributed code is,
of course, open-source. And yes it would execute just fine on the fully
open-source community-edition GitLab. I don't think "no regressions rule"
should apply here. This is for developers only, and is a template for making
your own pipeline mostly, with pieces which can be reused.

Nick