[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <D7AG776AI2EQ.KLG13BCOXBJL@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2025 18:36:00 +0200
From: "Jarkko Sakkinen" <jarkko@...nel.org>
To: "Nikolai Kondrashov" <Nikolai.Kondrashov@...hat.com>, "Laurent Pinchart"
<laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>, Leonardo BrĂ¡s
<leobras.c@...il.com>
Cc: "Vignesh Raman" <vignesh.raman@...labora.com>,
<kernelci@...ts.linux.dev>, <linuxtv-ci@...uxtv.org>,
<dave.pigott@...labora.com>, <mripard@...nel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
<linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>, <gustavo.padovan@...labora.com>,
<pawiecz@...labora.com>, <spbnick@...il.com>, <tales.aparecida@...il.com>,
<workflows@...r.kernel.org>, <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
<kunit-dev@...glegroups.com>, <nfraprado@...labora.com>,
<davidgow@...gle.com>, <cocci@...ia.fr>, <Julia.Lawall@...ia.fr>,
<laura.nao@...labora.com>, <kernel@...labora.com>,
<torvalds@...uxfoundation.org>, <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
<daniels@...labora.com>, <helen.koike@...labora.com>,
<shreeya.patel@...labora.com>, <denys.f@...labora.com>,
<nicolas.dufresne@...labora.com>, <louis.chauvet@...tlin.com>,
<hamohammed.sa@...il.com>, <melissa.srw@...il.com>, <simona@...ll.ch>,
<airlied@...il.com>, <Tim.Bird@...y.com>, <broonie@...nel.org>,
<groeck@...gle.com>, <rdunlap@...radead.org>, <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
<michel.daenzer@...lbox.org>, <sakari.ailus@....fi>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] kci-gitlab: Introducing GitLab-CI Pipeline for
Kernel Testing
On Fri Jan 24, 2025 at 3:00 PM EET, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
> On 1/24/25 2:16 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > On Fri Jan 24, 2025 at 10:12 AM EET, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> >> Gitlab as an open-source software project (the community edition) is one
> >> thing, but can we please avoid advertising specific proprietary services
> >> in the kernel documentation ?
> >
> > I don't think we should have any of this in the mainline kernel.
> >
> > One angle is that "no regressions rule" applies also to the shenanigans.
> >
> > Do we really spend energy on this proprietary crap to the eternity?
>
> This is not getting included into the kernel itself, the contributed code is,
> of course, open-source. And yes it would execute just fine on the fully
> open-source community-edition GitLab. I don't think "no regressions rule"
> should apply here. This is for developers only, and is a template for making
> your own pipeline mostly, with pieces which can be reused.
Ah, OK then it is fine. It was a kernel list so I assumed it was for
kernel.
Then: I don't care about this ;-) I use a different testing tool
(BuildRoot) and a different CI (Woodpecker in my local server).
So go ahead and do what you like...
>
> Nick
BR, Jarkko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists