[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250124164332.gqgzimfix3vk4bsw@jpoimboe>
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2025 08:43:32 -0800
From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>
To: Jens Remus <jremus@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Indu Bhagat <indu.bhagat@...cle.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
linux-toolchains@...r.kernel.org, Jordan Rome <jordalgo@...a.com>,
Sam James <sam@...too.org>, linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Weinan Liu <wnliu@...gle.com>, Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 09/39] x86/vdso: Enable sframe generation in VDSO
On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 05:00:27PM +0100, Jens Remus wrote:
> On 22.01.2025 03:31, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/dwarf2.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/dwarf2.h
> > index b195b3c8677e..1c354f648505 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/dwarf2.h
> > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/dwarf2.h
> > @@ -12,8 +12,11 @@
> > * For the vDSO, emit both runtime unwind information and debug
> > * symbols for the .dbg file.
> > */
> > -
>
> Nit: Deleted blank line you introduced in "[PATCH v4 05/39] x86/asm:
> Avoid emitting DWARF CFI for non-VDSO".
Indeed.
> > +#ifdef __x86_64__
>
> #if defined(__x86_64__) && defined(CONFIG_AS_SFRAME)
>
> AFAIK the kernel has a minimum binutils requirement of 2.25 [1]
> and assembler option "--gsframe" as well as directive
> ".cfi_sections .sframe" were introduced with 2.40.
True, I'll change it to just '#ifdef CONFIG_AS_SFRAME' since that's what
really matters (and 32-bit doesn't support it anyway).
> > + .cfi_sections .eh_frame, .debug_frame, .sframe
> > +#else
> > .cfi_sections .eh_frame, .debug_frame
> > +#endif
> > #define CFI_STARTPROC .cfi_startproc
> > #define CFI_ENDPROC .cfi_endproc
--
Josh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists