[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
<SA1PR12MB7199CFED7C5872095B1B08B1B0E32@SA1PR12MB7199.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2025 17:51:14 +0000
From: Ankit Agrawal <ankita@...dia.com>
To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
CC: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>, Yishai Hadas <yishaih@...dia.com>,
"shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com"
<shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com>, "kevin.tian@...el.com"
<kevin.tian@...el.com>, Zhi Wang <zhiw@...dia.com>, Aniket Agashe
<aniketa@...dia.com>, Neo Jia <cjia@...dia.com>, Kirti Wankhede
<kwankhede@...dia.com>, "Tarun Gupta (SW-GPU)" <targupta@...dia.com>, Vikram
Sethi <vsethi@...dia.com>, Andy Currid <acurrid@...dia.com>, Alistair Popple
<apopple@...dia.com>, John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>, Dan Williams
<danw@...dia.com>, Krishnakant Jaju <kjaju@...dia.com>, "Anuj Aggarwal
(SW-GPU)" <anuaggarwal@...dia.com>, Matt Ochs <mochs@...dia.com>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] vfio/nvgrace-gpu: Read dvsec register to determine
need for uncached resmem
>> @@ -868,6 +896,8 @@ static const struct pci_device_id nvgrace_gpu_vfio_pci_table[] = {
>> { PCI_DRIVER_OVERRIDE_DEVICE_VFIO(PCI_VENDOR_ID_NVIDIA, 0x2345) },
>> /* GH200 SKU */
>> { PCI_DRIVER_OVERRIDE_DEVICE_VFIO(PCI_VENDOR_ID_NVIDIA, 0x2348) },
>> + /* GB200 SKU */
>> + { PCI_DRIVER_OVERRIDE_DEVICE_VFIO(PCI_VENDOR_ID_NVIDIA, 0x2941) },
>> {}
>> };
>>
>
> GB support isn't really complete until patch 3, so shouldn't we hold
> off on adding the ID to the table until a trivial patch 4, adding only
> the chunk above? Thanks,
>
> Alex
Yeah, thanks for pointing that out. Will move it to a new patch.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists