linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mailmap, docs: Update email to carlos.bilbao@...nel.org

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c5ecf4a3-dbd4-4ba9-ae63-66ba396cecef@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2025 09:37:39 -0600
From: Carlos Bilbao <carlos.bilbao.osdev@...il.com>
To: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, carlos.bilbao@...nel.org
Cc: avadhut.naik@....com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
 linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mailmap, docs: Update email to carlos.bilbao@...nel.org

Hello,

On 1/20/25 13:54, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> Carlos Bilbao <carlos.bilbao.osdev@...il.com> writes:
>
>> By records I meant mappings of older to newer emails, which in my head
>> is .mailmap purpose with version control. Do you think some of the
>> mappings as I've added them are redundant and/or problematic?
> My point is that this line, which is in .mailmap now (and which your
> patch preserves):
>
>> Carlos Bilbao <carlos.bilbao.osdev@...il.com> <carlos.bilbao@....com>
> ...says to map the @amd.com address to the gmail address.  But this new
> line:
>
>> Carlos Bilbao <carlos.bilbao@...nel.org> <carlos.bilbao@....com>
> says to map @amd.com to @kernel.org instead.  At best, this is
> nonsensical; at worst, you may not get the full remapping of @amd.com
> that you seem to want.  So ... why leave that line in place?


That makes sense, thanks forclarifying. Sending out a patch correcting this
and updating myemail in MAINTAINERS now. Enjoy the weekend!
>
> Thanks,
>
> jon

Regards,
Carlos