[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4831a11659532873c20f0c693c248e5cefaddcbf.1737763916.git.yepeilin@google.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2025 02:18:17 +0000
From: Peilin Ye <yepeilin@...gle.com>
To: bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: Peilin Ye <yepeilin@...gle.com>, bpf@...f.org, Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@...weicloud.com>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@...il.com>, David Vernet <void@...ifault.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>, Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>, Song Liu <song@...nel.org>,
Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@...ux.dev>, John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>, Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...ichev.me>, Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>, Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@...nel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Quentin Monnet <qmo@...nel.org>, Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@...com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Josh Don <joshdon@...gle.com>, Barret Rhoden <brho@...gle.com>, Neel Natu <neelnatu@...gle.com>,
Benjamin Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v1 2/8] bpf/verifier: Factor out check_atomic_rmw()
Currently, check_atomic() only handles atomic read-modify-write (RMW)
instructions. Since we are planning to introduce other types of atomic
instructions (i.e., atomic load/store), extract the existing RMW
handling logic into its own function named check_atomic_rmw().
Signed-off-by: Peilin Ye <yepeilin@...gle.com>
---
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 0935b72fe716..2b3caa7549af 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -7536,28 +7536,12 @@ static int check_mem_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx, u32 regn
static int save_aux_ptr_type(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, enum bpf_reg_type type,
bool allow_trust_mismatch);
-static int check_atomic(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx, struct bpf_insn *insn)
+static int check_atomic_rmw(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx,
+ struct bpf_insn *insn)
{
int load_reg;
int err;
- switch (insn->imm) {
- case BPF_ADD:
- case BPF_ADD | BPF_FETCH:
- case BPF_AND:
- case BPF_AND | BPF_FETCH:
- case BPF_OR:
- case BPF_OR | BPF_FETCH:
- case BPF_XOR:
- case BPF_XOR | BPF_FETCH:
- case BPF_XCHG:
- case BPF_CMPXCHG:
- break;
- default:
- verbose(env, "BPF_ATOMIC uses invalid atomic opcode %02x\n", insn->imm);
- return -EINVAL;
- }
-
if (BPF_SIZE(insn->code) != BPF_W && BPF_SIZE(insn->code) != BPF_DW) {
verbose(env, "invalid atomic operand size\n");
return -EINVAL;
@@ -7641,6 +7625,26 @@ static int check_atomic(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx, struct bpf_i
return 0;
}
+static int check_atomic(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx, struct bpf_insn *insn)
+{
+ switch (insn->imm) {
+ case BPF_ADD:
+ case BPF_ADD | BPF_FETCH:
+ case BPF_AND:
+ case BPF_AND | BPF_FETCH:
+ case BPF_OR:
+ case BPF_OR | BPF_FETCH:
+ case BPF_XOR:
+ case BPF_XOR | BPF_FETCH:
+ case BPF_XCHG:
+ case BPF_CMPXCHG:
+ return check_atomic_rmw(env, insn_idx, insn);
+ default:
+ verbose(env, "BPF_ATOMIC uses invalid atomic opcode %02x\n", insn->imm);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+}
+
/* When register 'regno' is used to read the stack (either directly or through
* a helper function) make sure that it's within stack boundary and, depending
* on the access type and privileges, that all elements of the stack are
--
2.48.1.262.g85cc9f2d1e-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists