[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
<PN0PR01MB6028F4C8A9B203B3F0A0B487FEED2@PN0PR01MB6028.INDPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2025 08:29:49 +0800
From: Chen Wang <unicorn_wang@...look.com>
To: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
Cc: Chen Wang <unicornxw@...il.com>, kw@...ux.com,
u.kleine-koenig@...libre.com, aou@...s.berkeley.edu, arnd@...db.de,
bhelgaas@...gle.com, conor+dt@...nel.org, guoren@...nel.org,
inochiama@...look.com, krzk+dt@...nel.org, lee@...nel.org,
lpieralisi@...nel.org, palmer@...belt.com, paul.walmsley@...ive.com,
pbrobinson@...il.com, robh@...nel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, chao.wei@...hgo.com,
xiaoguang.xing@...hgo.com, fengchun.li@...hgo.com, helgaas@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] dt-bindings: pci: Add Sophgo SG2042 PCIe host
On 2025/1/23 1:21, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 08:52:39PM +0800, Chen Wang wrote:
>> On 2025/1/19 19:44, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
[......]
>>>> + msi-parent = <&msi_pcie>;
>>>> + msi_pcie: msi {
>>> 'msi' is not a standard node name. 'interrupt-controller' is what usually used
>>> to describe the MSI node.
>> OK. I will corret this.
> There is also 'msi-controller' node name used commonly, but it is not
> documented in the devicetree spec. Maybe you can use it instead and I'll add it
> to the spec since MSI and interrupt controllers are two distinct controllers.
Yes, "msi-controller" is better, I will use this, thanks.
Chen
[......]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists