[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z5dVc9yTynAsPDcZ@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2025 10:44:19 +0100
From: Stephan Gerhold <stephan.gerhold@...aro.org>
To: Luca Weiss <luca@...aweiss.eu>
Cc: ~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht, phone-devel@...r.kernel.org,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Stephan Gerhold <stephan@...hold.net>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>,
Matti Lehtimäki <matti.lehtimaki@...il.com>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 9/9] ARM: dts: qcom: msm8226-samsung-matisse-common:
Enable modem
On Sun, Jan 26, 2025 at 09:57:28PM +0100, Luca Weiss wrote:
> From: Matti Lehtimäki <matti.lehtimaki@...il.com>
>
> Enable modem remoteproc on samsung,matisse-wifi & matisselte.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matti Lehtimäki <matti.lehtimaki@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca@...aweiss.eu>
> ---
> arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom/qcom-msm8226-samsung-matisse-common.dtsi | 7 +++++++
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom/qcom-msm8226-samsung-matisse-common.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom/qcom-msm8226-samsung-matisse-common.dtsi
> index fbd568c7d6b7415d240aa1a2329d07cf9135274c..4155bfb2136022f2a85d69451c34f06ed2a700ac 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom/qcom-msm8226-samsung-matisse-common.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom/qcom-msm8226-samsung-matisse-common.dtsi
> @@ -225,6 +225,13 @@ &blsp1_uart3 {
> status = "okay";
> };
>
> +&modem {
> + mx-supply = <&pm8226_l3>;
> + pll-supply = <&pm8226_l8>;
Hmmmmm, so I was looking at msm8926.dtsi downstream and it seems to
override the msm8226.dtsi modem/mss definition [1]:
1. ext-bhs-reg is dropped
2. vdd_mss-supply is added
This common include seems to cover both apq8026 (matissewifi) and
msm8926 (matisselte).
Do we need to handle this difference?
First time I see such a difference between variants of a single SoC.
Looking at all the overrides in msm8926.dtsi, it seems like they made
quite some rework for the "LTE variant".
Thanks,
Stephan
[1]: https://github.com/GalaxyTab4/android_kernel_samsung_matissewifi/blob/45f97bab323176fead18c8ddc20dc57d979904a3/arch/arm/boot/dts/msm8226/msm8926.dtsi#L32-L40
Powered by blists - more mailing lists