[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z5dXJ1EIUx8DAh6J@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2025 09:51:35 +0000
From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To: Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko@...ionext.com>
Cc: Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 0/3] net: stmmac: Fix usage of maximum queue number
macros
On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 06:24:47PM +0900, Kunihiko Hayashi wrote:
> The maximum number of Rx and Tx queues is defined by MTL_MAX_RX_QUEUES and
> MTL_MAX_TX_QUEUES respectively.
>
> There are some places where Rx and Tx are used in reverse. Currently these
> two values as the same and there is no impact, but need to fix the usage
> to keep consistency.
I disagree that this should be targetting the net tree - I think it
should be the net-next tree. Nothing is currently broken, this isn't
fixing a regression, there is no urgent need to get it into mainline.
It is merely a cleanup because both macros have the same value:
include/linux/stmmac.h:#define MTL_MAX_RX_QUEUES 8
include/linux/stmmac.h:#define MTL_MAX_TX_QUEUES 8
Please re-send for net-next after the merge window and net-next has
re-opened.
In any case, for the whole series:
Reviewed-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>
Thanks!
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists