[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1925950.tdWV9SEqCh@rjwysocki.net>
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2025 14:38:25 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To: Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@...ux.intel.com>
Subject:
[PATCH v1 2/2] PM: EM: Slightly reduce em_check_capacity_update() overhead
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Every iteration of the loop over all possible CPUs in
em_check_capacity_update() causes get_cpu_device() to be called twice
for the same CPU, once indirectly via em_cpu_get() and once directly.
Get rid of the indirect get_cpu_device() call by moving the direct
invocation of it earlier and using em_pd_get() instead of em_cpu_get()
to get a pd pointer for the dev one returned by it.
This also exposes the fact that dev is needed to get a pd, so the code
becomes somewhat easier to follow after it.
No functional impact.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
---
kernel/power/energy_model.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/power/energy_model.c
+++ b/kernel/power/energy_model.c
@@ -774,7 +774,8 @@
}
cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
- pd = em_cpu_get(cpu);
+ dev = get_cpu_device(cpu);
+ pd = em_pd_get(dev);
if (!pd || em_is_artificial(pd))
continue;
@@ -798,7 +799,6 @@
pr_debug("updating cpu%d cpu_cap=%lu old capacity=%lu\n",
cpu, cpu_capacity, em_max_perf);
- dev = get_cpu_device(cpu);
em_adjust_new_capacity(dev, pd);
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists