lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <173800452243.222763.9229386892534609078.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2025 19:02:02 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Simon Trimmer <simont@...nsource.cirrus.com>, 
 Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.cirrus.com>, 
 Richard Fitzgerald <rf@...nsource.cirrus.com>, 
 Brendan Higgins <brendan.higgins@...ux.dev>, 
 David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>, Rae Moar <rmoar@...gle.com>, 
 Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: patches@...nsource.cirrus.com, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, 
 kunit-dev@...glegroups.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] firmware: cs_dsp: FW_CS_DSP_KUNIT_TEST should not
 select REGMAP

On Sat, 25 Jan 2025 20:32:15 +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Enabling a (modular) test should not silently enable additional kernel
> functionality, as that may increase the attack vector of a product.
> 
> Fix this by making FW_CS_DSP_KUNIT_TEST (and FW_CS_DSP_KUNIT_TEST_UTILS)
> depend on REGMAP instead of selecting it.
> 
> After this, one can safely enable CONFIG_KUNIT_ALL_TESTS=m to build
> modules for all appropriate tests for ones system, without pulling in
> extra unwanted functionality, while still allowing a tester to manually
> enable REGMAP_BUILD and this test suite on a system where REGMAP is not
> enabled by default.
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] firmware: cs_dsp: FW_CS_DSP_KUNIT_TEST should not select REGMAP
      commit: eb5c79828cfa72e8dbdf2db842a781ad6806cdaf

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ