lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202501271117.E00B5250@keescook>
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2025 11:17:52 -0800
From: Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>, Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>,
	Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
	Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@...ux.ibm.com>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] seccomp: kill the dead code in the
 !CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_SECCOMP_FILTER version of __secure_computing()

On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 03:30:39PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> How about
> 
> 	__secure_computing()
> 	{
> 		return secure_computing_strict(syscall_get_nr(...));
> 	}
> 
> in the "#ifndef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_SECCOMP_FILTER" section near
> secure_computing_strict() in kernel/seccomp.c ?

Yeah, that should be good.

-- 
Kees Cook

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ