[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <173809172397.948154.11710273039435718570.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2025 11:15:23 -0800
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>, 
 Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>, Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>, 
 Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>, 
 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, 
 LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, 
 Howard Chu <howardchu95@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] perf test: Skip syscall enum test if no landlock
 syscall
On Tue, 28 Jan 2025 09:06:29 -0800, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> The perf trace enum augmentation test specifically targets landlock_
> add_rule syscall but IIUC it's an optional and can be opt-out by a
> kernel config.
> 
> Currently trace_landlock() runs `perf test -w landlock` before the
> actual testing to check the availability but it's not enough since the
> workload always returns 0.  Instead it could check if perf trace output
> has 'landlock' string.
> 
> [...]
Applied to perf-tools, thanks!
Best regards,
Namhyung
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
