lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <742df0cb-1214-46a9-b004-97dfa8433f49@nvidia.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2025 09:36:22 +1100
From: Balbir Singh <balbirs@...dia.com>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
 Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>, Roman Gushchin
 <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>, Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@...ux.dev>,
 Muchun Song <muchun.song@...ux.dev>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
 cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: memcontrol: move memsw charge callbacks to v1

On 1/24/25 16:41, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> The interweaving of two entirely different swap accounting strategies
> has been one of the more confusing parts of the memcg code. Split out
> the v1 code to clarify the implementation and a handful of callsites,
> and to avoid building the v1 bits when !CONFIG_MEMCG_V1.
> 
>    text	  data	   bss	   dec	   hex	filename
>   39253	  6446	  4160	 49859	  c2c3	mm/memcontrol.o.old
>   38877	  6382	  4160	 49419	  c10b	mm/memcontrol.o
> 
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>

Acked-by: Balbir singh <balbirs@...dia.com>



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ