[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3a499ffe-0514-49bf-8022-06a9b713b920@linux.dev>
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2025 15:00:26 -0800
From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>
To: "Bastien Curutchet (eBPF Foundation)" <bastien.curutchet@...tlin.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, "David S. Miller"
<davem@...emloft.net>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>, Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@...il.com>,
Song Liu <song@...nel.org>, Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@...ux.dev>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>, Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...ichev.me>,
Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@...com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Alexis Lothore <alexis.lothore@...tlin.com>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 09/14] selftests/bpf: test_xdp_veth: Use
unique names
On 1/28/25 1:57 AM, Bastien Curutchet (eBPF Foundation) wrote:
> +#define NO_IP "NO_IP"
> #define PROG_NAME_MAX_LEN 128
> +#define NS_NAME_MAX_LEN 32
>
> struct veth_configuration {
> char local_veth[VETH_NAME_MAX_LEN]; /* Interface in main namespace */
> char remote_veth[VETH_NAME_MAX_LEN]; /* Peer interface in dedicated namespace*/
> - const char *namespace; /* Namespace for the remote veth */
> + char namespace[NS_NAME_MAX_LEN]; /* Namespace for the remote veth */
> int next_veth; /* Local interface to redirect traffic to */
> - char *remote_addr; /* IP address of the remote veth */
> + char remote_addr[IP_MAX_LEN]; /* IP address of the remote veth */
> };
>
> {
> - .local_veth = "veth2",
> + .local_veth = "veth2-",
> .remote_veth = "veth22",
> .next_veth = 2,
> - .remote_addr = NULL,
> - .namespace = "ns-veth22"
> + .remote_addr = NO_IP,
> + .namespace = "ns-veth22-"
> },
> -static int create_network(void)
> +static int create_network(struct veth_configuration *net_config)
> {
> - int i;
> + int i, err;
> +
> + memcpy(net_config, default_config, VETH_PAIRS_COUNT * sizeof(struct veth_configuration));
>
> /* First create and configure all interfaces */
> for (i = 0; i < VETH_PAIRS_COUNT; i++) {
> + err = append_tid(net_config[i].namespace, strlen(net_config[i].namespace));
> + if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "append TID to ns name"))
> + return -1;
> +
> + err = append_tid(net_config[i].local_veth, strlen(net_config[i].local_veth));
> + if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "append TID to local veth name"))
> + return -1;
> +
> SYS(fail, "ip netns add %s", net_config[i].namespace);
> SYS(fail, "ip link add %s type veth peer name %s netns %s",
> net_config[i].local_veth, net_config[i].remote_veth, net_config[i].namespace);
> SYS(fail, "ip link set dev %s up", net_config[i].local_veth);
> - if (net_config[i].remote_addr)
> + if (memcmp(net_config[i].remote_addr, NO_IP, 5))
nit. May be "if (net_config[i].remote_addr[0])" instead of defining a new
"NO_IP" and then memcmp.
> SYS(fail, "ip -n %s addr add %s/24 dev %s", net_config[i].namespace,
> net_config[i].remote_addr, net_config[i].remote_veth);
> SYS(fail, "ip -n %s link set dev %s up", net_config[i].namespace,
> @@ -155,7 +169,7 @@ static int create_network(void)
> return -1;
> }
Powered by blists - more mailing lists