[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z5h1OMgcHuPSMaHM@infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2025 22:12:08 -0800
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@...wei.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
zhangkun09@...wei.com, liuyonglong@...wei.com,
fanghaiqing@...wei.com, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>,
IOMMU <iommu@...ts.linux.dev>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC v8 3/5] page_pool: fix IOMMU crash when driver has already
unbound
On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 10:57:32AM +0800, Yunsheng Lin wrote:
> Note, the devmem patchset seems to make the bug harder to fix,
> and may make backporting harder too. As there is no actual user
> for the devmem and the fixing for devmem is unclear for now,
> this patch does not consider fixing the case for devmem yet.
Is there another outstanding patchet? Or do you mean the existing
devmem code already merged? If that isn't actually used it should
be removed, but otherwise you need to fix it.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists