[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z5iq2GJKIdlB9APM@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2025 12:00:56 +0200
From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>
To: Petr Pavlu <petr.pavlu@...e.com>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@...bridgegreys.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Brendan Higgins <brendan.higgins@...ux.dev>,
Daniel Gomez <da.gomez@...sung.com>,
Daniel Thompson <danielt@...nel.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com>,
Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,
Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@...hat.com>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>,
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>, Rae Moar <rmoar@...gle.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, Song Liu <song@...nel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
kgdb-bugreport@...ts.sourceforge.net, kunit-dev@...glegroups.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-modules@...r.kernel.org,
linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-um@...ts.infradead.org,
live-patching@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/9] module: switch to execmem API for remapping as RW
and restoring ROX
On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 01:50:31PM +0100, Petr Pavlu wrote:
> On 1/26/25 08:47, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > From: "Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)" <rppt@...nel.org>
> >
> > Instead of using writable copy for module text sections, temporarily remap
> > the memory allocated from execmem's ROX cache as writable and restore its
> > ROX permissions after the module is formed.
> >
> > This will allow removing nasty games with writable copy in alternatives
> > patching on x86.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <rppt@...nel.org>
>
> [...]
>
> > +static void module_memory_restore_rox(struct module *mod)
> > +{
> > + for_class_mod_mem_type(type, text) {
> > + struct module_memory *mem = &mod->mem[type];
> > +
> > + if (mem->is_rox)
> > + execmem_restore_rox(mem->base, mem->size);
> > + }
> > +}
> > +
>
> Can the execmem_restore_rox() call here fail? I realize that there isn't
> much that the module loader can do if that happens, but should it be
> perhaps logged as a warning?
It won't fail at this point. set_memory APIs may fail if they need to split
a large page and could not allocate a new page table, but here all the
splits were already done at module_memory_alloc() time.
> --
> Thanks,
> Petr
--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists