linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: net: wireless: describe the ath12k AHB module

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <112fe636-1328-49f0-8f0a-395764e118c7@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2025 11:21:04 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Raj Kumar Bhagat <quic_rajkbhag@...cinc.com>, ath12k@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>,
 Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Jeff Johnson <jjohnson@...nel.org>,
 Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
 Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: net: wireless: describe the ath12k AHB
 module

On 28/01/2025 10:29, Raj Kumar Bhagat wrote:
> On 1/28/2025 2:47 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 28/01/2025 10:10, Raj Kumar Bhagat wrote:
>>> Add device-tree bindings for the ATH12K module found in the IPQ5332
>>> device.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Raj Kumar Bhagat <quic_rajkbhag@...cinc.com>
>>> ---
>>>  .../net/wireless/qcom,ath12k-ahb.yaml         | 317 ++++++++++++++++++
>>>  1 file changed, 317 insertions(+)
>>>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/qcom,ath12k-ahb.yaml
>>
>> It was v4, now v1? So entire previous discussion and feedback is
>> missing? Go to previous series and implement entire feedback. Then use
>> proper versioning, proper changelog and make it obvious/understandable
>> to us, instead of sending v1 after v4 in entirely separate thread.
>>
> 
> I was asked to send DTS as a separate series, this is a new series for
> DTS hence stated with v1.


But we do not talk about DTS here, but bindings.


> To address the undocumented ABIs we have changes in dt-binding and hence

That's v1 so how it could have changes in the first place? Unless this
is v5?

> corresponding changes in driver as well. Let me know If we could send the
> complete series as v5.
> 
>> I also do not understand why this is sent to arm soc. That's wireless patch.
>>
> 
> All the email list are as per - './scripts/get_maintainer.pl'


I am asking why this patch is part of the arm soc patchset. This is
networking/wireless patch.

Best regards,
Krzysztof