[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <95382414-7A44-45A4-8F3F-C6D755422AD5@collabora.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2025 07:22:35 -0300
From: Daniel Almeida <daniel.almeida@...labora.com>
To: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>
Cc: Abdiel Janulgue <abdiel.janulgue@...il.com>,
rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org,
dakr@...nel.org,
robin.murphy@....com,
Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>,
Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>,
Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>,
Valentin Obst <kernel@...entinobst.de>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
airlied@...hat.com,
"open list:DMA MAPPING HELPERS" <iommu@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 2/3] rust: add dma coherent allocator abstraction.
Alice,
>
> The difference is exactly that - you reduce the amount of data copied
> to just the size of the field.
>
> Alice
>
Is your idea to have that *in addition* to the safe methods?
How does it work when you want to read a T at a time?
— Daniel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists