[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <173806186643.500545.9968635452635594761.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2025 11:57:46 +0100
From: Carlos Maiolino <cem@...nel.org>
To: dchinner@...hat.com, djwong@...nel.org,
Jinliang Zheng <alexjlzheng@...il.com>
Cc: chandanbabu@...nel.org, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jinliang Zheng <alexjlzheng@...cent.com>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v3] xfs: fix the entry condition of exact EOF
block allocation optimization
On Wed, 15 Jan 2025 20:35:25 +0800, Jinliang Zheng wrote:
> When we call create(), lseek() and write() sequentially, offset != 0
> cannot be used as a judgment condition for whether the file already
> has extents.
>
> Furthermore, when xfs_bmap_adjacent() has not given a better blkno,
> it is not necessary to use exact EOF block allocation.
>
> [...]
Applied to for-next, thanks!
[1/1] xfs: fix the entry condition of exact EOF block allocation optimization
commit: 915175b49f65d9edeb81659e82cbb27b621dbc17
Best regards,
--
Carlos Maiolino <cem@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists