[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250128112701.s2kgegovz625nuac@bogus>
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2025 11:27:01 +0000
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Lifeng Zheng <zhenglifeng1@...wei.com>, arm-scmi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/15] cpufreq: scmi: Set .set_boost directly
On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 02:28:15PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> The boost feature can be controlled at two levels currently, driver
> level (applies to all policies) and per-policy.
>
> Currently the driver enables driver level boost support from the
> per-policy ->init() callback, which isn't really efficient as that gets
> called for each policy and then there is online/offline path too where
> this gets done unnecessarily.
>
> Instead set the .set_boost field directly and always enable the boost
> support. If a policy doesn't support boost feature, the core will not
> enable it for that policy.
>
> Keep the initial state of driver level boost to disabled and let the
> user enable it if required as ideally the boost frequencies must be used
> only when really required.
>
Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
--
Regards,
Sudeep
Powered by blists - more mailing lists