linux-kernel - [PATCH v2 09/13] s390: switch stop_machine_yield() to using cpumask_next

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250128164646.4009-10-yury.norov@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2025 11:46:38 -0500
From: Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
	Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
	Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
	Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
	Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>,
	Hendrik Brueckner <brueckner@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
	Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
Subject: [PATCH v2 09/13] s390: switch stop_machine_yield() to using cpumask_next_wrap()

Calling cpumask_next_wrap_old() with starting CPU equal to wrapping CPU
effectively means the request to find next CPU, wrapping around if needed.

cpumask_next_wrap() is the proper replacement for that.

Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>
---
 arch/s390/kernel/processor.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/processor.c b/arch/s390/kernel/processor.c
index 42ca61909030..745649ad9779 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kernel/processor.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kernel/processor.c
@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ void notrace stop_machine_yield(const struct cpumask *cpumask)
 	this_cpu = smp_processor_id();
 	if (__this_cpu_inc_return(cpu_relax_retry) >= spin_retry) {
 		__this_cpu_write(cpu_relax_retry, 0);
-		cpu = cpumask_next_wrap_old(this_cpu, cpumask, this_cpu, false);
+		cpu = cpumask_next_wrap(this_cpu, cpumask);
 		if (cpu >= nr_cpu_ids)
 			return;
 		if (arch_vcpu_is_preempted(cpu))
-- 
2.43.0