[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250128-jubilance-mosaic-e3a81199aec8@spud>
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2025 18:10:59 +0000
From: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
To: Atish Patra <atishp@...osinc.com>
Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>,
Atish Patra <atishp@...shpatra.org>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>, weilin.wang@...el.com,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
kvm-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 09/21] RISC-V: Add Smcntrpmf extension parsing
On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 08:59:50PM -0800, Atish Patra wrote:
> Smcntrpmf extension allows M-mode to enable privilege mode filtering
> for cycle/instret counters. However, the cyclecfg/instretcfg CSRs are
> only available only in Ssccfg only Smcntrpmf is present.
>
> That's why, kernel needs to detect presence of Smcntrpmf extension and
> enable privilege mode filtering for cycle/instret counters.
>
> Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atishp@...osinc.com>
> ---
> arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h | 1 +
> arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h
> index 2f5ef1dee7ac..42b34e2f80e8 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h
> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h
> @@ -104,6 +104,7 @@
> #define RISCV_ISA_EXT_SMCSRIND 95
> #define RISCV_ISA_EXT_SSCCFG 96
> #define RISCV_ISA_EXT_SMCDELEG 97
> +#define RISCV_ISA_EXT_SMCNTRPMF 98
>
> #define RISCV_ISA_EXT_XLINUXENVCFG 127
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c
> index b584aa2d5bc3..ec068c9130e5 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c
> @@ -394,6 +394,7 @@ const struct riscv_isa_ext_data riscv_isa_ext[] = {
> __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(smmpm, RISCV_ISA_EXT_SMMPM),
> __RISCV_ISA_EXT_SUPERSET(smnpm, RISCV_ISA_EXT_SMNPM, riscv_xlinuxenvcfg_exts),
> __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(smstateen, RISCV_ISA_EXT_SMSTATEEN),
> + __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(smcntrpmf, RISCV_ISA_EXT_SMCNTRPMF),
> __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(smcsrind, RISCV_ISA_EXT_SMCSRIND),
Isn't the order here wrong?
* 3. Standard supervisor-level extensions (starting with 'S') must be listed
* after standard unprivileged extensions. If multiple supervisor-level
* extensions are listed, they must be ordered alphabetically.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists