| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <3fb44500b87b0f1d8360bc7a1f3ae972d3c5282f@linux.dev> Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2025 00:21:43 +0000 From: "Ihor Solodrai" <ihor.solodrai@...ux.dev> To: "Tejun Heo" <tj@...nel.org>, "David Vernet" <void@...ifault.com>, "Andrea Righi" <arighi@...dia.com>, "Changwoo Min" <changwoo@...lia.com>, "Alexei Starovoitov" <ast@...nel.org>, bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: selftests/sched_ext: testing on BPF CI Hi Tejun, Andrea. I tested a couple of variants of bpf-next + sched_ext source tree, just sharing the results. I found a working state: BPF CI pipeline ran successfully twice (that's 8 build + run of selftests/sched_ext/runner in total). Working state requires most patches between sched_ext/master and sched_ext/for-6.14-fixes [1], and also the patch "tools/sched_ext: Receive updates from SCX repo" [2] On plain bpf-next the dsp_local_on test fails [3]. Without the patch [2] there is a build error [4]: missing SCX_ENUM_INIT definition. We probably don't want to enable selftests/sched_ext on BPF CI with that many "temporary" patches. I suggest to wait until all of this is merged upstream. You can check the full list of patches here: https://github.com/kernel-patches/vmtest/pull/332/files [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tj/sched_ext.git/log/?h=for-6.14-fixes [2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/Z1ucTqJP8IeIXZql@slm.duckdns.org/ [3] https://github.com/kernel-patches/vmtest/actions/runs/13019837022 [4] https://github.com/kernel-patches/vmtest/actions/runs/13020458479
Powered by blists - more mailing lists