linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 00/13] Modem support for MSM8226

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Z5nld1JiaqWgmlZ0@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2025 09:23:19 +0100
From: Stephan Gerhold <stephan.gerhold@...aro.org>
To: Luca Weiss <luca@...aweiss.eu>
Cc: ~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht, phone-devel@...r.kernel.org,
	Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
	Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
	Stephan Gerhold <stephan@...hold.net>,
	Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>,
	Matti Lehtimäki <matti.lehtimaki@...il.com>,
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
	Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/13] Modem support for MSM8226

On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 12:35:32AM +0100, Luca Weiss wrote:
> This series adds support for modem remoteproc found on MSM8226.
> It also adds needed device tree nodes and enables modem used for
> location service on matisse-wifi.
> 
> Also bam-dmux node is added for mobile data which is used on
> 3G/4G-enabled devices.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca@...aweiss.eu>
> ---
> Changes in v4:
> - Drop mx from .proxy_pd_names for msm8974 as it's always a regulator
>   @Stephan: Please check that one also since I still picked up your R-b

Sneaky! But yeah, since you drop mx from fallback_proxy_supply, you
should also drop it from proxy_pd_names, that makes sense. I didn't see
that.

Thanks,
Stephan