[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87jzadlvkm.fsf@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2025 12:15:53 +0100
From: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>
To: "Timothy Garwood via B4 Relay"
<devnull+gtimothy-dev.protonmail.com@...nel.org>
Cc: "Miguel Ojeda" <ojeda@...nel.org>, "Alex Gaynor"
<alex.gaynor@...il.com>, <gtimothy-dev@...tonmail.com>, "Boqun Feng"
<boqun.feng@...il.com>, "Gary Guo" <gary@...yguo.net>, Björn Roy Baron
<bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>, "Benno Lossin" <benno.lossin@...ton.me>,
"Alice Ryhl" <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, "Trevor Gross" <tmgross@...ch.edu>,
<rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] rust: HrTimerMode replacement with bitfield_options
macro
"Timothy Garwood via B4 Relay" <devnull+gtimothy-dev.protonmail.com@...nel.org> writes:
> From: Timothy Garwood <gtimothy-dev@...tonmail.com>
>
> replace the HrTimerMode enum with a bitfield wrapper built using the
> bitfield_options macro
>
> ---
> This patch provides an example of usage of the bitfield_options macro
> proposed in [1] as a replacement for the HrTimerMode enum introduced in
> [2].
> [1] is a RFC.
> This patch depends on both [1] and [2]
>
Very cool!
Since `hrtimer` is not upstream yet, if you get a non RFC version ready
before the next `hrtimer` spin, I can put a dependency on that if you
want?
Best regards,
Andreas Hindborg
Powered by blists - more mailing lists